trackd_logo_dark-1

They say information is power.
At trackd, we believe it's also peace of mind.

Collective defense in cybersecurity means information sharing to battle the bad guys as a group.

Vulnerability Management should be about Remediation

Leveraging unpatched software vulnerabilities is a favorite initial access technique used by malicious cyber actors, and is the cause for an overwhelming majority of successful breaches. For the past two decades, vulnerability management technology has focused on identification and reporting, and only recently on risk-based prioritization of vulnerabilities. Yet, although all of the technical controls seem to be in place, there hasn’t been a positive, meaningful impact to the vulnerability landscape. It’s quite the opposite: vulnerability disclosures, successful attacks, and post-breach spending are constantly increasing.

Why is that the case?

Those responsible for remediation have no way to know what the impact of applying a patch will be, but expect it to be catastrophic. In fact, the vast majority of patches can be applied safely, with little risk of disruption. The problem isn’t fundamentally technical. It’s the fear of uncertainty, the unknown. It’s human.

Indeed, in survey after survey, one of the top reasons operators give for not patching timely is the fear of breaking something.

Vulnerability management should be about remediation

Vulnerability Management
should be about Remediation

Leveraging unpatched software vulnerabilities is a favorite initial access technique used by malicious cyber actors, and is the cause for an overwhelming majority of successful breaches. For the past two decades, vulnerability management technology has focused on identification and reporting, and only recently on risk-based prioritization of vulnerabilities. Yet, although all of the technical controls seem to be in place, there hasn’t been a positive, meaningful impact to the vulnerability landscape. It’s quite the opposite: vulnerability disclosures, successful attacks, and post-breach spending are constantly increasing.

Armored knight representing defensive capabilities of trackd

Why is that the case?

Those responsible for remediation have no way to know what the impact of applying a patch will be, but expect it to be catastrophic. In fact, the vast majority of patches can be applied safely, with little risk of disruption. The problem isn’t fundamentally technical. It’s the fear of uncertainty, the unknown. It’s human.

Indeed, in survey after survey, one of the top reasons operators give for not patching timely is the fear of breaking something.

A pair of binoculars representing the vigilance of the trackd cybersecurity system

So how does trackd help?

Comparative insights on patches

trackd leverages an ever-growing dataset to inform users about how patches they need to apply have behaved in others’ environments.


No more fear of uncertainty

By providing insight into the effect of a patch, the remediation team’s cause for concern and the fear of uncertainty no longer exists. The remediation team can then build and execute an appropriate response based on the patch’s known previous impacts.

Reduced fear of disruption

trackd gives remediation teams the data (and therefore, the confidence) to patch more aggressively, greatly reducing their fear of disruption, and, more importantly, their cyber risk.

Frictionless automation toolset

trackd was founded to solve for the human fear of the unknown first, then to provide a frictionless toolset to automate vulnerability remediation when it’s safe, and let you know when a patch is likely to be disruptive.

So how does trackd help?

Comparative insights on patches

trackd leverages an ever-growing dataset to inform users about how patches they need to apply have behaved in others’ environments.

No more fear of uncertainty

By providing insight into the effect of a patch, the remediation team’s cause for concern and the fear of uncertainty no longer exists. The remediation team can then build and execute an appropriate response based on the patch’s known previous impacts.

Comparative insights on patches

trackd leverages an ever-growing dataset to inform users about how patches they need to apply have behaved in others’ environments.

No more fear of uncertainty

By providing insight into the effect of a patch, the remediation team’s cause for concern and the fear of uncertainty no longer exists. The remediation team can then build and execute an appropriate response based on the patch’s known previous impacts.

Reduced fear of disruption

trackd gives remediation teams the data (and therefore, the confidence) to patch more aggressively, greatly reducing their fear of disruption, and, more importantly, their cyber risk.

Frictionless automation toolset

trackd was founded to solve for the human fear of the unknown first, then to provide a frictionless toolset to automate vulnerability remediation when it’s safe, and let you know when a patch is likely to be disruptive.

Reduced fear of disruption

trackd gives remediation teams the data (and therefore, the confidence) to patch more aggressively, greatly reducing their fear of disruption, and, more importantly, their cyber risk.

Frictionless automation toolset

trackd was founded to solve for the human fear of the unknown first, then to provide a frictionless toolset to automate vulnerability remediation when it’s safe, and let you know when a patch is likely to be disruptive.

Ask us Anything

Ask us Anything